Posted by Phù Vân (136..98.176) on June 20, 2023 at 10:07:58:
Tóm lại, Chúa cho phép loài người ăn thịt thú vật, nhưng vì Chúa là Đấng dựng nên tất cả mọi vật nên Chúa cấm loài người khg được ăn 1 số thú vật, vì Chúa biết rõ những độc hại của những loài thú này.
Mr PV thấy rõ hơn chưa ? Chúa khg cấm sát sinh mà chỉ muốn cấm loài người ăn những thú vật mà Chúa biết rõ ăn vào là sẽ có hại cho thân xác người ăn, ô uế có nghĩa là làm dơ thân xác, là làm hại, làm bị bịnh ...
----
Did Jesus oppose the Jewish system of sacrificing animals? That’s one of several claims that a reader named Bobby English made recently: he claims that Christ’s cleansing of the Temple was about His desire to eliminate this bloody sacrificial system, and that it wasn’t even what was called for in the Old Covenant. It turns out he’s getting these claims from something called the Nazarene Way of Essenic Studies. Here are the relevant claims:
Undergirding the theory that it was the cheating moneychangers whom Jesus targeted as the culprits in the system of animal sacrifice, is the claim that the whole process had become “too commercial.” This is akin to claiming that the institution of slavery had to be dismantled because it had became too commercial. Although both Temple sacrifices and human slavery had a firm economic foundation, it was the inherent immorality of those systems that brought together the historical forces which finally led to their collapse.
Several hundred years after prophets like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos, and Hosea had denounced the sacrificial slaughter of animals, Jesus carried out what is euphemistically called the Cleansing of the Temple. It was just before Passover and he disrupted the buying and selling of animals that were being purchased for slaughter. And because Christian scholars and religious leaders continue to ignore biblical denunciations of that bloody worship, they also try to obscure the reason for Christ’s assault on the system.
They have done this by focusing on the moneychangers, although they were only minor players in the drama that took place. It was the cult of sacrifice that Jesus tried to dismantle, not the system of monetary exchange. In all three gospel accounts of the event, those who provided the animals for sacrifice are mentioned first: they were the primary focus of Christ’s outrage.[….]
And in biblical times, most people were illiterate and dependant on what their religious leaders taught them concerning the scriptures. But it is not easy to understand why contemporary Christians uphold the validity of the cult of animal sacrifice. In an age of widespread literacy, there is a choice to be made. The bible clearly presents an ongoing conflict between those forces that demanded sacrificial victims in the name of God, and those forces that opposed it as a man-made perversion. And Jesus demonstrated The Way of the Nazoreans.
And because there is a choice to be made, it is deeply disturbing to see Christian leaders joining hands across the centuries with their ancient counterparts, in order to validate a system of worship in which the house of God became a giant slaughterhouse, awash in the blood of its victims.
----
Mr PV thấy rõ hơn chưa ?
Thưa bạn,
Ai không tìm hiểu kỹ, lỡ ăn nhằm con vật nằm trong list độc lại thì tội cho họ!
Jesus đã phải dẹp đi cái vụ mua bán súc vật, đụng chạm tới quyền lợi của bọn chúng!!
Thì như vầy đi, tôi đơn giản cho rằng những kẻ thương buôn có chính quyền chống lưng đã sửa kinh thánh để trục lợi mà thôi!
tôi tin rằng Chúa thương tất cả động vật, cũng không kỳ thị vật nào ăn được vật nào nên tránh không ăn được!